Archive for the ‘Podcast’ Category
Friday, May 13th, 2011
This is a short video to show you how I used my Neos Adventurer All Season Overshoes from Outdoor Photo Gear to keep feet warm and dry while in Antarctica and the Falkland Islands recently. It’s not an incredibly difficult subject but it took me a few times to get my head around the process and be able to get this footwear on quickly and out to the Zodiacs waiting to take us ashore.
You can also view the embedded video on your iPad, thanks to Vimeo!
Don’t forget to hit the full-screen button in the video window to view the video full-screen.
Note that there is an iPod/iPhone version of this video in iTunes, which is good for portability, but if you’re watching on a computer, the video above is better.
Neos Adventurer All Season Overshoes: http://mbp.ac/nosa
Baffin Boots on Amazon: http://mbp.ac/ambb
Note: These are affiliate links. The cost to you is unchanged of course, but you will be supporting the Podcast by buying with these links. Thank you!

Follow Martin on twitter here: http://twitter.com/MartinBailey
Check out Martin's blog here: http://blog.martinbaileyphotography.com/
And finally, get info on Martin's workshops here: http://www.mbpworkshops.com/
Hi there, I'm Martin Bailey, and today I'm going to show you how I kept my legs and my feet dry when I was down in Antarctica last month.
What we're going to look at, basically, obviously you need some footwear. These are Baffin Boots. They're good down to like minus 70 degrees Celsius. These are my winter weather, insulated boots, that I use anywhere it is going to be cold.
But when you are going to be jumping in and out of zodiacs, or I'm doing beach landings, you want something to keep the saltwater off of these and also to give you a little bit more height.
These are basically what I bought. They're Neos Overshoes. These are the Adventurer All Weather Overshoes. I bought these from Outdoor Photo Gear. I'll put a link in the show notes and in the video.
Basically, these are what we're going to put over the boots. Nice and big so that you can do that. And then to stop water to get in even over the top of these, but you don't want to be really wearing waders down there. We've got just normal rainproof trousers. I'm going to show how to put these on. It's not difficult, but it's just something that obviously it took me a little bit of time, to get used to the rhythm of things. So I'm going to show you that today.
So, boots on first, what you see is, you need to pull the rainproof trousers on, under the bottom part there, and obviously, I would usually be wearing thicker trousers than this, if it's really cold weather, but this is not important for this review.
So we'll do the boots up nice and tight. Then we get the Neos Adventurer All Season Overshoes. Now these boots are big. To get an overshoe that will go over the top of these, I needed the XXL size I think they were. You can see that it takes a little bit of rummaging around. But then once you've got yourself in there, that's it. You've got the boot on there, and you just tuck this around. I generally then go over and make sure that the Velcro is all in contact. Then here's your adjustable strap. Pull that across nice and tight.
There you've got your overshoe on the top. That can stop water to this height. It's difficult to see this with everything being black, but then if you pull the rainproof trousers down to there, you can literally take water even higher than the top of the overshoe. Literally, I took a wave a few times well over the knee and my feet were dry as a bone and toasty for the whole time.
Let's stick the other one on for good measure. Just to show you that again. You can see my embarrassingly white legs, which my wife says they actually glow in the dark. Obviously, they don't, but they are very white. Tighten them up. Once again, grab the Neos overshoes. I put a link to Outdoor Photo Gear to actually pick up these boots or to select another range. Basically, there you go, bring this around and get it tight. Make sure that the Velcro strip is tight. Of course the water can get in through here, because the tunnel comes right the way up to the top. It doesn't have to be perfect. The Velcro itself is not the waterproof element here. Once again, pull the rain trousers down, over the top, and we have one waterproof legged Martin.
So that's that, really not a difficult subject, but something that it took me a little bit of sorting getting used to the process. So I thought I'd share that with you today.
Also, the Neos range are excellent. I do recommend that you use that. The Neos range are great quality, really good build, and they are very light. With this combination on, I walked quite a ways on the Falkland Islands. It wasn't like a trek in the Himalayas, but even with the overshoes on, I was able to trek for a good couple of miles one day in the Falklands. You can just leave them on. You can take them off if you want to. Their main purpose is to, like I say, keep you dry, when you're getting in and out of the Zodiacs, which are like the large river boat with an outboard motor. They keep you dry if you got a lot of swell when you're on the gangplank. Also when you get off the Zodiacs, a lot of the time, you actually end up having to wade in the sea for a few paces before you get onto the dry land.
So basically, once you're there though, you can take them off. Generally, there is a little base there that we make, and you walk around and photograph and then come back. Now, the good thing about leaving them on though is, if you are down somewhere else away from the base, and you feel like it's a good shot where you need to be a little bit out into the sea maybe, just walk out there. It's not a big deal, if you got your boots on.
So thanks for joining me today. Remember that if you go over to the blog, blog.martinbaileyphotography.com, I'll put a bunch of links into the show notes for you there, one over to RPG and Outdoor Photo Gear, because they are great bunch and they support the show in various ways. I like to support them as well. Please go over there and take a look at what they have to offer. If you need some overshoes, Neos is the way to go.
Catch you later.
Tags: adventurer, Antarctica, footwear, Martin Bailey, neos, overshoes, review, ship, Tips & Techniques, videos, waterproof, winter, zodiac Posted in Equipment Review, Podcast, Video | No Comments »
Tuesday, May 3rd, 2011

After a busy break, Chris from OPG is back on the DPE podcast as the "Gear Guru". He'll be featuring a group of gear each podcast, and discussing that gear with Juan.
Both Rick and Juan love answering your questions. No question is too basic or too advanced, so if you have questions you would like answered, please send them on in and they’ll get to it pretty soon. You can send your questions via email to or click on the “Contact us” button on the top of the http://dpexperience.com website.
The DPE podcast is sponsored by the amazing folks at SmugMug. Make sure to check them out and if you sign up by following this link, you get an awesome 20% off your first year! How cool is that!

This is Episode number 34 of the Digital Photo Experience Podcast with Rick Sammon & Juan Pons.
Make sure to subscribe to the podcast via iTunes here: DPExperience Podcast on iTunes so you don’t miss a single episode.
Listen to the podcast here: [audio:http://dpexperience.com/podcast/Episodes/DPE-20110501.mp3]
To download the mp3 file directly click here
Hope you enjoy this episode.
Show Notes/Links
Tags: acratech, DPE, gearguru, Juan Pons, Mt. Rainier, photo meetup, questions, Rick Sammon, workshop Posted in Equipment Review, Featured Products, Podcast | No Comments »
Sunday, February 20th, 2011
Soft Light, Dennings Point, NY
On a recent visit to one of my favorite locations in the Hudson Valley, I was fortunate to find some very unique weather conditions. Recent sub-zero temperatures and lots of snowfall created some really strong foreground elements, and I was able to “walk” out on to the frozen Hudson to try and capture some interesting perspectives. My goal here was to emphasize as best as I could the relationships between the foreground and the mountains in the distance. This included lines and shapes, highlights and shadows, as well as the color variations as you move from the cool foreground to the warm and bright light in the distance.
More than anything else, I wanted to capture how I felt, which was mostly excitement, incredibly alive breathing the crisp air @ 5°, but also warm from knowing I was doing exactly what I wanted to do.
These are all part of the “ingredients” that I talk about in my workshops that help contribute to an image that is visually interesting, and hopefully conveys the feeling and mood of the scene. Of course, capturing the image is only part of the process – interpreting the RAW file to achieve your ultimate vision is just as important to the overall workflow. The creative decisions made in the processing stage is the focus of this video, the “why” of moving a slider in Lightroom. I hope you enjoy this podcast episode – I have several more coming in the near future. As always, please leave any questions or feedback in the comments section below – I always enjoy hearing from you.
Learn more about Robert, his images, his blog and his workshops at his website: www.robertrodriguezjr.com
Tags: Hudson, lightroom, Video Podcast, winter Posted in Podcast, Video, Workshops | No Comments »
Wednesday, November 17th, 2010
Here's a link to this week's DPE Podcast, full of bird photography tips and other great info:

In this episode of the DPE podcast Rick interviews Chris MacAskill, co-founder of SmugMug, Juan & Rick interview Chris Klapheke, owner of Outdoor Photo Gear, and between the two interviews Rick and Juan answer your questions.
To get the enhanced version of the podcast with images and chapter markers, subscribe to the podcast via iTunes here: DPExperience Podcast on iTunes
Listen to the podcast here:
For those that need a plain mp3 feed click here
To download the mp3 file directly click here
Show Notes/Links
Tags: Chris Klapheke, chris macaskill, DPE, Juan Pons, Rick Sammon, smugmug Posted in Podcast | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 9th, 2009
This Podcast was originally released as a Martin Bailey Photography Podcast on Apr 12, 2008.
Prefer to listen? There’s an audio player at the bottom of the post.
I’ve rarely seen an easy to understand explanation of how the aperture and distance to the subject affects the depth-of-field in our images. When I started to think about how I would explain this, I started to understand why, because it wasn’t easy to do this in a simply way, and I still am not sure if I’ve succeeded. I’m sure you’ll let me know. Anyway, I’ve created six diagrams to help me explain this. I’ve not attempted to draw scientifically accurate diagrams, rather just created them in Microsoft Word to help me explain more easily with words. So let’s jump right into it and attack what should be a very simple subject, though it never seems to be.
I’ve included the diagrams below, but I also published a rough PDF of the diagrams, as it might be easier to compare the diagrams by just flicking through the pages of the PDF. If you move page by page rather than scrolling, you see the next chart an instant after the first, so it’s very easy to see the changes.
Anyway, let’s go ahead and look at Diagram #1. You can see that I’ve basically drawn a mock-up of a lens, with a few lens elements, and an aperture ring. The dotted line running through the center of the lens is the lens axis, and the thin blue lines that make their way through the lens from the film plane to the point we are focusing on in basically representing the light coming into the camera. I’ve used the actual metrics associated with a 50mm lens, and for now, we are focusing at 2m, or around 6.6ft, and I’ve made the aperture F2.8, which I’m imagining is pretty much wide open for this 50mm lens.
 Diagram #1
What I want you to take note of right now is the X that the blue lines makes as it intersects at the point at which we have focused the lens, two meters in front of the lens. Either side of the X I have drawn a circle. You can think of this circle as the circle of confusion if that helps. If you don’t understand what the circle of confusion is, take a listen to Episode #65 when I discussed Hyper-focal Distance. It’s not important that you fully understand what the circle of confusion is right now though. Just think of it like this. As we move away from the point that we are focused on, the elements in the frame start to become less sharp. The point that we are focused on is the most sharp, but even before we leave what we call the depth-of-field, things start to get closer to being what we’d consider out of focus. These circles represent the nearest and furthest points at which the subject or elements around it will still be perceived by us as being in focus. In the diagrams I’ve called this the far limit and the near limit of acceptable sharpness. So, the light travels from the scene, into the camera through the lens, and the elements within the lens move around when we focus to make sure that the image comes into focus at the focal point on the film or sensor that we can see as a dotted line on the bottom right of the diagram. Although some of the lens elements do move around in reality, it’s not important to understand this concept, so I’ve not changed them in the diagrams.
Before we move on to the next diagram, let’s note the size of the depth-of-field when focusing at 2m with a 50mm lens. The depth of field is 27cm, or just over 10 inches. Also visually note the angle of the intersecting lines that make the X at the point at which we are focusing. Let’s now take a look at Diagram #2.
 Diagram #2
The only difference between diagram one and two, is I’ve stopped the aperture down by two stops from F2.8 to F5.6. You’ll see that the angle of the intersecting lines making the X at the point we are focusing on, still 2 meters, is now much closer. So that we are all thinking the same way, imagine you are looking at the X from the front of the lens, so the lines just got closer. Now, the circles that represent the near and far limits of acceptable sharpness have to be moved further out so that they fit between the lines. With just two stops smaller aperture, the depth-of-field widens from 27cms, to 54cms, almost double. This is because we are focusing at 2m, just over six feet from the film plane.
Let’s look at one more diagram while focusing at 2m. In Diagram #3 we will close the aperture by a further two stops to F11. Look how close the two intersecting lines of the X at the point we are focused on are now. We can also see that the depth-of-field has increased greatly. Now to get the two circles of acceptable sharpness between the lines, we have to move them much further apart. The depth-of-field increases to 1.14m, or 3.74ft. Compared to the 27cm we had with an aperture of F2.8 focused at 2m, we now have over four times more depth of field. So, we have seen here that even at the same distance to subject, we can greatly increase our depth-of-field, just by making the aperture smaller.
 Diagram #3
In addition to the aperture though, distance to subject, even at the same aperture has a huge effect on the depth-of-field. Obviously, because the lines of the X that we’ve been looking at continue to move apart, and the further away from the depth-of-field, or the area of acceptable sharpness they get, the more blurred the foreground and background gets. This is why the more acute the angle of the X the more quickly we start to see lots of out of focus areas, or bokeh. In Diagram #4 I’ve scaled the diagram down to around 1/2 size so that we can get it on the page, but if you look at the numbers and the size of the camera etc. I don’t think this will be too confusing.
 Diagram #4
Anyway, what we’ve done now is kept the aperture at F5.6, which is of course relatively wide, but now we’ve focused on something 5m or 16.4ft away. Look how much closer the lines of the intersecting X are now compared to diagram #2 when we were focusing at just 2m. The depth-of-field has also increased from 54cm or 1.7ft to a whopping 3.8m or 12.5ft. This is seven times more depth-of-field, just by focusing at 5m instead of 2m. So now we can see how focusing further away increases the depth-of-field even with the same aperture.
Just to reinforce this, let’s now look at Diagram #5, and focus much closer to the lens. Let’s imagine we focus at 50cm, or 1.65ft in front of the film plane. All focusing distances are measured from the film plane by the way, so it’s not a problem thinking about the distance from the film plane instead of from the front element of your lens. Still with an aperture of F5.6, see how wide the lines of the intersecting X are now, and how close the circles of near and far acceptable sharpness now are. We have a depth-of-field of just 3cm, or just over an inch.
 Diagram #5
If we open the aperture up to F2.8, as in Diagram #6, we can see that the lines of the X get even wider apart, and the depth-of-field is reduced to 2cm, or just over half an inch. If we compare this to Diagram #1, when we focused at 2m with the same F2.8, the depth-of-field has reduced from 27cm to just 2cm, by changing the focusing distance from 2m to 50cm, or one quarter of the distance.
 Diagram #6
I think we’ve probably had enough of diagrams now, so I didn’t make any more, but I’m sure this will help you to appreciate why the depth-of-field gets so much shallower when doing very close macro work. Sometimes we’re focusing on things just in front of the lens, literally, if working at magnifications larger than life size. Say I’m using a short macro lens, and focusing on something very close to the lens, at about 20cm from the film plane, my depth-of-field is reduced to 2mm, because the lines of the X intersect at such a wide angle. When you do go larger than life size, it is not uncommon to have a depth-of-field of less than a millimeter, and have to stop down to F11 or F16 to get more than a millimeter.
The other thing to bear in mind is that focal length has an influence of depth-of-field as well. The reason for this is because if we still focus at 2m, say with a 100mm lens, instead of a 50mm lens, the subject is magnified to twice the size. This in turn means that we are magnifying the circles of acceptable sharpness, so they go out of focus twice as much. To counter this we have to half the size of the circle for it to still be acceptably sharp, and that means that the circles move closer to the intersection of the X, and the depth-of-field decreases. Basically the longer the focal length of our length, the smaller the circles of acceptable sharpness get.
Anyway, I hope this has helped if you didn’t really understand why aperture and subject distance affected the depth-of-field the way it does. If you are still confused, how about grabbing a small object, and a tape measure, and setting up your camera on a tripod and put the object 2m away from the camera, and take three photos. One with your lens wide open, then stop down by 2 stops, so if you start at F2.8 you’ll go to F5.6 and a third having stopped down by 2 more stops, so F11. If your lenses widest aperture is F4, try F4, F8 and F16. Then move the object you shot to 50cm, or as close as you can focus on it, if your lens doesn’t focus as close as this, and shoot three more shots with the same three apertures. Then move the object out to 5m, and repeat the three shots. Then take a look at your images on your computer, and you will be able to see the difference very clearly.
Another very simple trick you can try is to hold out your finger, at arm’s length, and focus on it. Notice how blurred the background is using your peripheral vision, that is don’t actually focus on the background, just see it while focusing on your finger. Then move your finger towards your eyes, while continuing to focus on it, kind of like in AI Servo or continuous focusing mode. As your finger gets closer, you’ll notice that your surrounding go out of focus even more. Move the finger back out, and the surrounds become more focused. You can do this with both eyes open or just one and see the effect, but bear in mind that your camera only has one lens, so closing one eye should help you to see very much as your eye does.
Podcast show-notes:
Here is the PDF file that contains the six diagrams I use to explain this topic: http://www.martinbaileyphotography.com/podcasts.php?dt=ti&ep=132.1#Ep132.1
Here’s a link to Mikkel Stegmann’s Barnack utility that I reference so much, and mentioned in the Podcast:http://www.stegmann.dk/mikkel/barnack/
Audio
[podcast]http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3?http://www.bokeaji.com/podcasts/MBPP_Ep132.mp3[/podcast]
Download the Enhanced Podcast M4A files directly.
Tags: Depth-of-Field, DoF Posted in Podcast, Tips and Tricks | No Comments »
Wednesday, August 5th, 2009
Originally released as Martin Bailey Photography Podcast, Episode 190, you can listen along if you’d prefer using the audio player at the bottom of the post.
Long Exposures can push a photographer and our gear a little out of our comfort zone, but they can also be a lot of fun. In April 2009 I was reminded of this when I did some long exposure photography over at a small harbor town called Ooarai, roughly translated as the Big Wash, in the Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. I’ve been doing a lot of travelogue type Podcasts lately though, so today I thought I’d move away from that and do a 10 step guide, but of course, interweave some of my real world example shots to make the points easier to understand.
Firstly, let’s make a distinction between Long Exposure and slow shutter speeds. I personally don’t like to use the term slow shutter speed in this case, because it’s pretty subjective. If you are shooting a flying bird at 1/60th of a second, this would be considered a slow shutter speed, if you were trying to freeze the movement of the bird’s wings, because it will be too slow to do so. It may not though be slow enough if you want to pan with the bird and create that beautiful sine shape made by capturing the wing movement. 1/60th of a second will also not be slow enough to make a large body of water smooth over into a dreamy blur. Anyway, let’s start looking at my 10 steps.
Step #1: Find a subject that will be complemented by a long exposure
As we get into Step #1, let’s bring up image number 1802, which will be on your screen now if you are listening in iTunes or on your iPhone, or you can view on the Podcasts page at martinbaileyphotography.com. So, the first thing you need to do, is decide on a subject that will be improved or have something accentuated by capturing it with a long exposure. It could be shots of fireworks displays, lightning strikes and car light trails. I’ve done all these, and have some example images, but maintaining my main nature photography theme, I thought I’d look at this landscape shot from almost a year ago, in Nagano prefecture here in Japan. I talked about it back in episode 141 as well. There are a few points that we’ll make while looking at this image, but the first, as I say, is finding a subject that will work with a long exposure. Your entire shoot doesn’t necessarily have to revolve around the Long Exposure shot. This image was very much opportunistic. But when I turned the corner on my way to the hotel, I saw the scene, and knew instantly that this would make a nice long exposure image. There were both heavy, textured clouds in the sky and a thick cloud layer in the valley, both of which would blur nicely with a multi-second exposure. It was also getting dark, with literally just a few minutes of light left in the sky, so I had to move quickly. This image was shot at F11 with ISO 100 for 20 seconds. Not incredibly long yet, but it was long enough for the clouds to move towards me, making this wonderful radiating pattern in the sky. This is accentuated of course because I was using a wide angle lens and the clouds closer to me appear to move faster than those in the distance. The 20 second exposure was also long enough to make the clouds in the valley blur making them almost look like a lake down there, behind the silhouetted foreground trees.
 Yachiho Evening Sky #1
Step #2: Include a static anchor object
I find that long exposure images work well when you have something that will remain stationary in the image. It doesn’t necessarily have to be in the foreground, but if you don’t have something in the shot that doesn’t move, then the whole thing becomes a blur, and although that can work, it’s not going to be as powerful as having a rock solid anchor for the eye. In the image we’re currently looking at, the line of trees is the anchor. It’s a sharp, solid line for us to come back to, to keep everything in perspective, with that big sky adding drama to the scene.
Step #3: Use a sturdy tripod and good ball-head
Of course, if you are going to be doing long exposures, to keep the anchor object sharp, you’re going to need to keep your camera very still during the exposure and this requires a good sturdy tripod. One of the biggest mistakes people make when getting involved in photography is underestimating the value of a good tripod. It’s understandable, because when you first start out, you have the expense of getting a new camera, a few lenses, a camera bag, and these days if you don’t already have one you’re going to need a reasonably powerful computer and then there’s all the software. It seems to be never ending. So the last thing you want to spend a lot of money on is a $500 or even a $1,000 tripod. The problem is, at about the time you figure out why you need a tripod, you probably also find out that the one you picked up for $30 is about as useful as a chocolate frying pan. Don’t get me wrong, I did this myself. I’m right in there with you.
The game is still changing though, believe me. I thought I was doing just the right thing buying a nice Manfrotto tripod for around $450, and I stuck an Acratech Ultimate Ball-head on there, both of which are excellent pieces of kit, but when I moved from 12 megapixels with the 5D to 21 megapixels in the 1Ds Mark II and now also with the 5D Mark II, I found that with my longer lenses, like the 300mm F2.8, even my $450 tripod wasn’t quite cutting it. It had seen some wear though, but it was perhaps a bit small, and not really rated for such heavy gear either. The only way I could get things locked down enough for good sharp results in such high resolution images, was to buy a $1,000 Gitzo Tripod. The Acratech Ultimate Ball-head is still used from time to time on my second Gitzo Tripod, and it is a great ball-head, but my main ball-head right now is the Really Right Stuff BH-55. This is simply a work of engineering art. It not only operates beautifully, and locks the camera in position, stopping it dead with no effort, but it also looks and feels great. We can get into that in more detail in another episode though. The point is, buy the best tripod and ball-head or tripod head that you can afford, especially if you are going to be doing long exposure photography. If your camera gets blown around in the wind during the exposure you’ll end up with soft images.
Step #4: Use ISO and Aperture to go long, but beware of Diffraction
You should also use your lowest standard ISO for long exposures. Even if you are shooting in very dark conditions, set your ISO to the lowest standard setting, because if you start to bump it up, you’ll not only get shorter exposures, you’ll also start to introduce noise, where you really don’t want. Now, by the lowest “standard” ISO setting, I mean the lowest ISO rating that your camera has without going into any kind of expanded ISO. If your camera has expanded ISO settings, it usually means the manufacturer wasn’t comfortable making those ISOs available by default for one reason or another, so if ISO 100 is the lowest your camera goes to without you making any custom settings, then use that.
On my camera I usually use ISO 100 most of the time, but pretty much always unless I’m using the Highlight Tone Priority setting, in which case ISO 200 becomes my lowest ISO. Let’s bring up image number 1668, to help make this point. In this image, I was using Highlight Tone Priority to preserve the highlights in the snow. I don’t use Highlight Tone Priority much now, but at the time, that’s what I was thinking when I shot this image.
 Snow and Stream
The next thing you’re going to want to think about is using a smaller aperture. Note though, that if you stop your lens down too much, you’ll find that diffraction starts to degrade your image. When we force light through a very small aperture, we start to lose resolution. It varies, but most lenses start to suffer from around F16. I generally tend to use down to F11, and only go as low as F16 when I really need to. F22 is for emergencies only in my book, and I only go there when I can live with lack of sharpness in my resulting image. I shot the first three images that we’ll look at today at F11 by the way.
Step #5: Use a Neutral Density filter when there’s still too much light
So, even when we have selected the lowest available ISO, and the smallest aperture that we are prepared to use, we sometimes still have too much light in the scene for the length of exposure that we want, and that’s when a Neutral Density or ND filter comes in. I’ll get back to what I used in the last image shortly, but for now, let me explain what an ND filter is. They are basically grey filters that cut out light without affecting the color balance of the image. They are rated with conveniently confusing numbers. An ND2 for example cuts out 1 stop of light, an ND4 cuts out 2 stops of light, and an ND8 cuts out 3 stops of light. There are much darker filters such as the ND64 at 6 stops, and the ND10000 at 13 stops etc. You may actually remember two wonderful PDF files that our good friend Landon Michaelson put together that we released with Episode 111. (Long Exposure PDF and Dark Frame Subtraction PDF). Well, I’m mentioning this right now, because the first document contains information on the various density filters and how many stops of light they cut out, so go back and check that for more detail.
Another type of ND filter that I should probably touch on before we move on, is the Vari-ND from Singh-Ray. This filter turns, a little like a Circular Polarizer, although contrary to common believe, it doesn’t simply use two polarizing filters to work. As you turn the filter though, you get a totally variable neutral density between 2 and 8 stops of exposure. Going back to the image we brought up earlier, I used a Singh-Ray Vari-ND filter in this shot to increase my shutter speed to 8 seconds. The Vari-ND is a bit expensive for what it is, and it can create some weird, unwanted effects with wide angle lenses in certain types of light, so it is not a magic bullet. But I find it works well with longer lenses, like the 70-200mm that I used here. I can’t remember exactly but probably dialed in about 6 stops of darkness for an 8 second exposure, which gave me this nice silky feel to the water in the shot.
Step #6: Take the guess work out of exposure
If you are using very dense neutral density filters, and you are working at a time of day when you can’t afford to do a multi-minute exposures only to find that you got it wrong and then the light is gone, you need to do a test first. The best thing to do is to meter and find your required exposure, maybe even shoot a text image, without the ND filter attached. Then when you are happy with the exposure, attach the filter and recalculate your exposure with the filter on. This will save you time, especially if your camera is using dark frame subtraction to reduce noise, and you’ll possibly also save yourself from making a mistake that could cost you your shot. You might recall that I mentioned an iPhone application called NDCalc back in episode 177. If you find the mental arithmetic difficult, NDCalc is perfect for calculating the new exposure in seconds, just by inputting your shutter speed before adding the filter and the density of the filter that you’ll attach.
Step #7: Focusing on what you can’t really see!
Focusing can be tough when it gets very, very dark. If you are working in normal light of course, and the darkness is coming from a very dense ND filter, the best thing to do is to focus before you put the ND filter on. If the front element of your lens rotates when you focus though, mind that you are careful not to rotate it when you attach the filter or you’ll throw your focus off. Even pushing on the front of the lens or grabbing the lens barrel can throw of the focus, so care is needed, but this will help you to focus while you can still see.
If it is already pretty dark, as it was when I shot the next image, number 2256, the chances are you no longer need an ND. Here I had some very faint light reflecting from the sea, but this exposure took four minutes at F8, so you can probably imagine how faint the scene was. I did a couple of things here though to focus, that I wanted to pass on to you. Firstly, through the lens, because there was a little bit of contrast, I could just about see when the outline of the main subject, which is the gate here. While turning the focus ring while looking through the viewfinder, I could just about make out the silhouette of the gate getting smaller as got into sharp focus. Once you go past the point where the focus is sharpest, it starts to get bigger again, so you just backtrack to where it was smallest and you’re there. If you have LiveView when you can faintly see, the image on the LCD can be noisy, but give it a try as well. Zoomed in to 5 times magnification, I could also see the outline of the gate getting gradually bigger and smaller as I moved in and out of focus.
 Ooarai Torii (Shinto Gate) Seascape
If there simply is not enough light to focus visually, either through the viewfinder or on Live-view, you can try taking a powerful torch or flashlight, and actually throwing some light on your subject while you focus. If the light is powerful enough, it may even give your camera enough to auto-focus, but at the least, this should be enough for you to manually focus accurately. Be sure to actually switch your lens into manual mode though, especially if you use the default settings which have auto-focusing linked to your shutter button. You don’t want to manually focus then have the camera start to search for focus again when you go to trip the shutter. Also, if you are shooting with other people, you might mess up their photographs by shining a flashlight into the scene, so be aware of that. You could of course if you are alone use that same flashlight to do some light painting during your long exposure, which is fun, but that’s really another topic.
Step #8: Minimize camera shake with a cable release and mirror lockup
In addition to a good sturdy tripod, use a cable release or remote timer switch to avoid causing vibration with your hands when you press the shutter button to start the exposure. If you are using 30 seconds or less shutter speeds, you can use your camera’s timer, which will allow you to start the exposure, and then take your finger away from the camera, and allow any vibration to die down before the exposure starts.
If your camera has Live-view, and you use it, then you don’t need to worry about mirror lockup, because the mirror will already be up out of the way when you trip the shutter. If you don’t have Live-view though, or if at some point in the future the way Live-view works is changed, and that’s very possible because it’s still a new technology, you may need to set your camera to Mirror Lockup mode. This is basically where the first press of the shutter button makes your camera’s mirror jump up out of the way, exposing the shutter in front of the film or sensor, and then when you press the shutter button again, the shutter is opened and exposure starts. This helps to reduce vibration, caused by the mirror jumping up if you do that at the same time as you start the exposure. If you have a two second timer, you can often use this in conjunction with mirror lockup. What will happen is, if you set the two second timer and mirror lockup together, when you release the shutter, the mirror will lockup, and the two second timer will start automatically, and when the two seconds is up, the shutter is opened and the actual exposure starts.
Step #9: Use Bulb Mode
Most cameras’ longest shutter speed is 30 seconds. If you are going to go past thirty seconds, you’ll have to use Bulb mode, which is usually the B on the mode dial. This is basically where your camera’s shutter will stay open for the whole time that you are holding the shutter button down. Here, when I say shutter button, we’re talking about the button on the cable release, because remember, you don’t want to be touching your camera directly to start the exposure. You can hold the button down for the entire exposure, but most cable releases have a little slider that can be slid up or down, over the button once pressed, to stop it from lifting up again, effectively holding the button down for you. If you are timing your exposure, make sure that you use a stop watch with a beep when it gets to the time, or some sort of timer that will let you know when the time is up. If you use something like NDCalc that I mentioned earlier for the iPhone, not only does it help with the calculation of long exposures, but once you have the long exposure time displayed, you can start the count-down with the touch of a button on the display. It then plays a sound when the time is up, so you can stop the exposure manually. Of course before too long the iPhone will talk directly to the camera and stop the exposure for you, but we aren’t quite there yet.
The alternative to manually timing the exposure is a Timer Remote Controller like Canon’s TC-80N3, which allows you to dial in how many minutes and seconds, and hours for that matter, that you want it to continue to keep the camera’s shutter open. This is great for use in Bulb mode. You set the time of your required exposure, press shutter release on the Remote Controller, which is basically just a fancy cable release, and when the time’s up, the shutter closes. One other word of advice that kind of goes without saying, but I’m going to say it anyway, is when using bulb or doing really long exposure work, make sure you have fully charged batteries in your camera. It wouldn’t be much fun to get half way through a long exposure and your batteries die on you.
Step #10: Noise Reduction
Most cameras these days will by default automatically process images made with long exposures to remove noise. I find that the built in noise reduction in the camera and in Lightroom is enough for shots like the ones we looked at today. For this last shot, even with a four minute exposure, there was no real noise in the image after my camera had done its thing and Lightroom had applied its default noise reduction. Having said this, if you are shooting in warm conditions you can get more noise, and with longer exposures you can end up with a bit of noise. When I do have noise in my images, my favourite noise reduction software now is Nik Software’s Define, that can be found in the Noise Reduction package and the other Nik Software Suites. I also find that Noise Ninja from PictureCode does a good job of reducing the noise, and it’s highly configurable. There’s also a product called NeatImage, which is equally as good I believe.
Note (Martin Bailey 2009/7/30):
There were some great follow up comments and tips not included above in the Photography Forum.
Podcast Show-notes:
Noise Ninja from PictureCode can be found here: http://www.picturecode.com/
NeatImage can be found here: http://www.neatimage.com/
Really Right Stuff are here: http://reallyrightstuff.com/
The Acratech Ballheads can be seen here: http://acratech.net/
The music in this episode is from the PodShow Podsafe Music Network at http://music.podshow.com/
[podcast]http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3?http://www.bokeaji.com/podcasts/MBPP_Ep190.mp3[/podcast]
You can also download the Enhanced Podcast M4A files directly.
Tags: long exposure, Podcast, Tips and Tricks Posted in Podcast, Tips and Tricks | 2 Comments »
Tuesday, August 4th, 2009
About six weeks ago I bought a Lensbaby Composer, and although I released an Initial Impressions review here on my blog straight away, having now had a chance to take it through its paces a little more, here’s a more in-depth review of what I’ve found to be more than a lens. In some circumstances it can be the perfect aid to photographic creativity.
First I’ll touch on some my initial impressions from my first blog post. The first thing that struck me when I opened the box is that the Lensbaby Composer is big and heavy. I don’t mean heavy like a big L lens, but it’s got a good weight. I have a first generation Lensbaby, and a Lensbaby 2.0 and never really like the way they looked on the camera. I use big 5D and 1Ds series cameras, and always have the battery grip on the 5D. To me, the old Lensbabies just looked a little bit too small on the camera, and never felt balanced. This is really not the case with the Composer. It feels very similar in size, weight and overall balance, to having the Canon EF 50mm F1.4 or F1.8 lens on the camera.
One of the other things I noticed quickly is that the Lensbaby Composer has a metal mount. I should have noticed this from the pictures I’ve seen of it online, but I hadn’t. This was another great surprise. Overall, the build just feels great, right down to the knurling etc on the focus ring, and the second ring used to lock the movable Lensbaby head in place.
You can see the metal mount in the photo below as well as the dedicated lens case that you can also buy as an option. The case is very well made and well worth the additional $15 in my opinion.
 Lensbaby Composer with case and aperture rings etc.
The other thing I never liked about the old Lensbabies was the softness of the images. I read on the Lensbaby Web site that the Composer came fitted with the multi-coated Double Glass Optic, from the Optic Swap System, which allows you to change the optics to use the Composer with various lenses. I didn’t buy any other Optics this time. I figured I’d see how much I use the composer first, and also, I wanted to check the build quality, though that’s now behind me.
 Lensbaby Composer on the 5D Mark II
One of the other things that I find geeky about the Lensbaby, in a nice way of course, is that to change the aperture you have to literally change the aperture ring in the front of the lens. As you can see above, the Lensbaby comes with a little plastic holder with a magnet that looks a little bit like a small plastic frying pan with a cap to keep the aperture rings safely inside. You use the magnet to remove the current aperture ring, and then drop in your required aperture ring size, and it is sucked in and held in place by the magnets around the front of the lens. Without any aperture ring the Lensbaby Composer has an aperture of F2, and then you have all the rings for full stops from F2.8 down to F22.
I couldn’t wait to try the Composer out to see just how sharp it was with the new double glass elements, so I grabbed my tripod on that first evening and headed out into a thunder storm to give it a try. The following two images were the results of this tiny excursion into the elements in Tokyo. The first image is number 2287, of the roof tops in the storm. This was taken with the F4 aperture ring installed. Here I lined up the sweet spot, which is where the lens is sharp, with the building on the horizon. I used an ISO of 50 for an 8 second exposure, and the clouds are nicely lit because of the lightening that struck while the shutter was open.
 Tokyo Rainstorm with Lensbaby Composer @ F4.0
I was pretty amazed to see that on closer inspection of the images on my PC later, the area inside the sweet spot was incredibly sharp. The Lensbaby Composer with the Double Glass Optic is as sharp as many of my Canon L lenses. I am very impressed with the image quality. You can also see from this first image that the areas outside of the sweet spot flow off to the edges of the frame really nicely.
So that you can check the sharpness of the lens for yourself, here is a 100% crop of the sharp part of the above image.
 100% crop @ f4.0, 8 second exposure
I wanted to check if the glass was still sharp at F2.8, so I also shot a test image with the F2.8 aperture ring installed, which I uploaded to my gallery as image 2288. Still at ISO 50, the below image was shot with a one second exposure. The first tip for using a Lensbaby here is that sometimes, the most obvious subject in the frame is not always the best one to focus the sweet spot on. Here I moved the sweet spot down onto the rooftops of the houses in the foreground, and allowed the more obvious building on the hill to go out of focus. This works too I think, though it probably comes down to person preference which one you think is the better image. Experiment though by all means. The Lensbaby is in my mind as much a creative tool as it is a lens. Just looking through it and playing is a major part of the fun of this system.
 Tokyo Rainstorm with the Lensbaby Composer @ F2.8
Again, here’s a 100% crop of this image so that you can see how sharp it is at F2.8. I am really impressed with this lens, I can tell you.
 100% crop @ f2.8, 1 second exposure
 Billiard Balls with Lensbaby @ F2.0
I realized while preparing for this review that still didn’t yet have any images shot at F2.0, so I shot some billiard balls (right) to see how the Lensbaby Composer fared wide open. I focused on the 9 ball in the front of the line, and we can see how this has basically enabled me to pretty much get the nine-ball in focus, but then everything else is nicely blurred. Because the Lensbaby has a sweet spot of focus, rather than a line of depth-of-field, parallel to the film plane or your digital sensor, even the felt of the billiard table has very little texture out outside of the immediate surroundings of the nine-ball.
We’ll look at a 100% crop in a moment, but I did want to touch on a technique that I’m perfecting for aligning the sweet spot with your chosen subject within the frame. I have to admit, I don’t find aligning that sweet spot particularly easy, especially when shooting hand-held, as I was here. I shoot most of my images with a tripod, and when using a tripod, especially with live-view, it’s a lot easier. You can move things around while viewing on the LCD, tweak the focus, and then shoot. When shooting hand held though, things are a little more hit and miss, so as I get more practice with the lens, here’s what I’m finding myself doing.
Basically, I straighten up the Lensbaby Composer a little, if it was bent off center that is, and I focus roughly on the subject that I want to align the sweet spot too, then recompose, if the subject is off center, which is usually is. Then I start to twist the Lensbaby around, making sure that I’ve loosened the locking ring at the base of the lens, so that I can freely move it around. As I find my intended main subject in the frame, looking through the viewfinder by the way, I move the sweet-spot around it a little, as it’s easier to see if you have the sweet-spot over your subject when it starts to go back out of focus as you go a little past it. Then you just back up to where you were a moment before. When you think you have it right, you have to fine tune the focus again, with the focus ring at the front of the Lensbaby.
Then, when I have the sweet spot on my subject, I wiggle the camera around a little, pretty much repeating the last step, but with the camera now, rather than bending the lens itself. Again, as you move the camera around, you can see your main subject move in and out of the sweet-spot, and this enables you to confirm that you have that sweet-spot where you really want it. If you find you’re off a little, continue to move the front of the lens around, until you get it right. Another tweak of the focus to make sure you’re sharp, and then you’re good to start shooting. I’m sure with practice, this gets easier and quicker. If you are shooting people or kids that move around, you’ll need to really work on getting the sweet-spot where you want it, then focusing quickly and ripping off your shots.
I wanted to make sure that the Lensbaby Composer was sharp at F2.0 as well, so I took at look at the nine-ball at 100% (below). You can see that the lines around the black nine are very sharp, although you have to bear in mind that these balls are maybe not the best subject to prove this with. I shot this at ISO 400, so it’s just a little bit grainy, but you can certainly tell that the sharpness is there. For a lens of this price, I have to say I’m still very impressed with the image quality.
 100% crop of the Billiard Ball shot at F2.0
For comparison, I shot the same ball with a Canon EF 50mm F1.2 L lens at the same aperture, F2.0. The Lensbaby is said to have a focal lens of around 50mm too, which is why I chose the Canon 50mm to compare it with. Both shots were made hand held, and I actually changed the ISO to 200 for the below shot, because you get a little bit of light drop off with the Lensbaby as you twist it off center, but I wanted to keep a similar shutter speed. This means though that there is no grain to speak of in this image. You can see that the overall look is a tad softer with the Canon lens. There’s definitely a nice quality to the Canon 50mm image, but it shows that the Lensbaby Composer is definitely as sharp as its competitors in that sweet-spot, if not sharper.
 100% crop shot with a Canon EF 50mm F1.2 L lens at F2.0
Let’s move on now to some other example images that I’ve been capturing since getting my Lensbaby. Next up is image number 2297 (below), that I shot in a small town way up north called Joboji. I took a drive up a country road that I found on my last visit, and noticed this abandoned shack in the woods. Now I have to admit, I am still sometimes turning to the Lensbaby as a means to an end, rather than it being my first choice. I have to really embed it in my work-flow before I can truly work with this lens. Here though, there was a thick black power cable running across the top of the scene. You can just about see it in the blur, running from the top right corner, down past the top of the shack just before the blue of the sky starts, then down to about a third of the way into the image from the top as it makes its way to the left of the frame.
 Shack in Woods (Lensbaby @ F5.6)
 Kudan (Nine Steps) Falls (Lensbaby @ F11)
I reached for the Lensbaby Composer, as I knew that it would help me to make the cable go away. I used the F5.6 aperture ring, for a wider sweet-spot, which I aligned with the side of the shack and a little of the foreground. This gave me a pretty eary image, with the trees in front of the shack, and the tree trunk and foliage to the left running out of the frame nicely. I was pretty pleased with the result, and pleased that the cable made me think of the Lensbaby.
I’d shot some other images between the previous one and the next we’ll look at, and I’ll put a link in the show-notes to show not only all the Lensbaby images I’ve made so far, but it will also pick up everything I shoot from now on as well. Next though, image 2311 (right), is another image where the subject demanded that I use the Lensbaby. I found these falls just off the track as I walked along the Oirase Mountain Stream recently, but there were these fallen logs and branches in the front of the falls, and I was not entirely impressed with the surroundings.The foreground was boring, and I just didn’t think it would work ‘straight’. I used the F11 aperture ring for a very wide sweet spot, as I really wanted to blur just the outer edges of the image. I also wanted a longer shutter speed, and F11 helped me to get to 3/5 of a second. I’m pretty pleased with the resulting image, and again, I think the Lensbaby helped me to make something of what I would otherwise have walked away from.
The last example image that I wanted to look at is of the Oirase Mountain stream itself, in image number 2314 (below, right). Here I was standing with my tripod legs perched precariously on three separate rocks, with the camera standing over the fast flowing water. Probably not the best spot to change out lenses, but I decided to try a shot of this with the Lensbaby before I moved on. Again, using the F11 aperture ring, I think I also held an ND8 neutral density filter in front of the lens here to give me a 4/5 of a second exposure at ISO 100. I may have done that for the last shot as well, but I’m not sure. Anyway, again here the large sweet spot has given us lots of the scene in focus, but the outer edges are all blurry, giving us a nice creative feel to the image.
 Oirase Mountain Stream (Lensbaby @ F11)
So, to summarize my overall impressions of the Lensbaby composer, on the plus side, I really like the way you can now focus the Lensbaby with a focus ring, like a traditional lens, and the focus mechanism is totally separate from the adjustment of the sweet spot. I have both the Lensbaby 1.0 and 2.0, though I skipped the 3rd generation War of the Worlds model. I never liked the fact that you had to keep your hands on the 1st and 2nd generation lensbabies though, both to focus them and to adjust the position of the sweet-spot. All of that is behind me now though, with the Lensbaby Composer, and as I say, with the new double glass optics, the Lensbaby Composer is tack-sharp in that sweet-spot. The addition of the sturdy little lens case, albeit an optional purchase, also adds a lot to the overall usefulness of the lens. I can drop it into the inside pocket of my photographer’s vest, so it’s always with me.
I only have a couple of very small little peeves, though for the price I am more than satisfied. One thing is that when you turn the locking ring to lock the front of the lens in place, it sends the focus off. If it held focus when locking it down, it would almost be a little too good. I’m finding that I’m applying just enough tension with the locking ring to stop the front of the lens from flopping around, but not so much that I can’t move it, and just leave it like that.
The other thing is more an enhancement request than a problem, but I’d really like the Composer’s optional lens case to have a belt loop. It’s great as it is, but with a belt loop I could have quick and easy access to the Lensbaby Composer while walking around town or on location etc.
Apart from these two tiny things though, having now used the Lensbaby Composer in the field for a while, it’s still a big thumbs up. With the new optics, this really is now ready for the serious photographer that wants his or her images to be tack sharp where they need to be, but still being able to have fun with the overall creativity of this wacky little lens.
Podcast Show-notes:
All of Martin’s Lensbaby Composer shots: http://www.martinbaileyphotography.com/thumbnails.php?album=search&search=Lensbaby_Composer
Music from Music Alley: http://www.musicalley.com/
[podcast]http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3?http://www.bokeaji.com/podcasts/MBPP_Ep202.mp3[/podcast]
You can also download the Enhanced Podcast M4A files directly.
Tags: Lensbaby, review, Tips and Tricks Posted in Equipment Review, Podcast, Tips and Tricks | 1 Comment »
|
 |
|