Posts Tagged ‘Art’
Monday, August 8th, 2011

MONARCH BUTTERFLY WING SCALES
One of the things I love about photography is it appeals to both the geek and the artist in all of us. On the geek side you have the technical considerations of making an image; the f-stops, shutter speeds, depth of field, histograms, dynamic range, and that hyperfocal distance stuff that we must all master in order to communicate our vision. Of course we can’t forget about all the ‘geeky’ gear, super telephotos, focusing rails, tele-converters, extension tubes, fill flash, and such. On the artistry side things are a little tougher to define, shape, color, composition, mood, balance, and that fickle mistress light, to mention just a few.
To make a great photograph you have to find the balance between the geek and the artist. If you lean too much toward the geek your pictures, while technically perfect, can lack emotion. They may not reach out and touch the viewer; they can be missing a mood or feeling. Conversely, too much focus on the artistry at the expense of the technical may leave your work riddled with technical flaws distracting the viewer from your message. Most photographers tend to lean in one direction or the other, some are master technicians crossing every t and dotting every i in their images. While others have a flair for the artistic not having the time or desire to bother with all of that technical stuff. A truly great photographer finds a balance and mastery of these two opposing disciplines.
The best photography communicates with the viewer. It reaches out and touches them in some way. Your message does not have to be some deep life changing affirmation. It can be something as simple as, “Wow look how pretty this is!” The most effective way to communicate your message is without technical flaws that distract the viewer from your message. The most powerful way to reach someone is by touching their soul with your artistry.
Browse Steve's wonderful images, read his blog, and learn about his incredible variety of workshops at his site www.stevegettle.com
Tags: Art, technology, viewpoint Posted in Articles, Commentary, Creativity, Vision | No Comments »
Thursday, June 9th, 2011

Until last year I had never enjoyed the thrill of making my own photographic prints. When I needed a print, I’d send off a file (or slide) to whatever lab I was using at the time and they’d ship the print directly to me or my client. With only a few exceptions my image viewing experience consisted of staring at a photo on a computer monitor.
Then, I bought an Epson Stylus Photo R2880 printer and everything changed. If that sounds like a dramatic statement – it is. It’s also quite true. I started making my own prints. Whenever I wanted. On whatever paper I wanted. It didn’t take long and I was addicted to the smell of fresh ink on photographic paper as a new print rolled off the printer, landing ever so gently in the catch tray. Is there a difference between viewing an image on a computer monitor and holding an actual print, that you made, in your hands? You’d better believe it.
As an artist I like to have complete control over my work from start to finish. While it is true that you maintain a degree of control when you do all the post-processing on your photos before sending them off to a lab, you’re really not closing the loop. The ultimate control comes when you conclude the image making process by crafting your own print. Today’s inkjet printers are capable of producing professional quality archival prints that rival and, in my opinion, exceed those made using more traditional methods like Cibachromes. They’re sharper, more detailed, just as colorful and can be made using a diversity of papers.
While difficult to quantify, there is a certain pleasure and satisfaction in handling an honest to God hand-crafted print. It is a tactile experience. You feel the weight of the paper, the texture. Unseen details emerge. Perhaps you feel pride in the knowledge that the print you are holding was born of your own creativity, and that without your vision and skills it would cease to exist. I get none of this from viewing an image on a computer monitor.
I’ve also noticed that people react differently when viewing my photographs in print. On the computer (or iPad), they quickly flick through the images. When I hand over my portfolio book I’ve noticed that they linger on each image. They don’t madly flip from one page to the next. Do people, even non-photographers, appreciate a fine art print more than they do an image on a screen? It would seem so.
What is your experience with pixels vs. prints?
Learn more about Bret, view his images, scout his workshops and read his blog here.
Tags: Art, Bret Edge, photography, printmaking Posted in Articles, Commentary, Viewpoint | 1 Comment »
Friday, October 8th, 2010
I vaguely remember the old days, back before I had an SLR and lenses and filters and a tripod. When I’d see a pretty scene, I'd whip out my point & shoot and take a picture before continuing on my way. I wasn’t creating art. Nope, I was just memorializing on film (yes, film) a scene or a moment that intrigued me. Nothing more, nothing less. Things are different today. I lug around a big D-SLR with several lenses, a few filters, a tripod and a bunch of other stuff that I use not to record simple memories, but to create something approaching “art”.
Over the years I’ve heard photographers say they are “taking pictures, making images, capturing a moment, shooting photos” and a billion other phrases that essentially mean the same thing. Or do they?
.jpg)
I can’t help but think that “taking pictures” or “shooting photos” is entirely different from what I and most other serious photographers do when we head out with our cameras. I like to think that I am creating art.
By it’s very nature, art is subjective. What I think is a gorgeous piece of artwork you may think is a bunch of squiggly lines on canvas. So, the images I create, that I consider art, you may consider just another pretty photo. Or, maybe it’s just another ugly photo. Only you can decide that. The point is this – I’m not just documenting a scene before me. I’m trying to create something that is elevated from being a mere snapshot to something that others may consider to art.
What’s the difference? Here’s what I think. Taking a picture doesn’t involve much, if any creativity, very little effort and no creative vision. You see a big mountain reflecting in an alpine lake, you walk up to the lakeshore, point your camera and click the shutter. Done.
.jpg)
Creating art works in a whole different way. Let’s assume the same situation: big mountain and pretty reflection in alpine lake. Maybe you’re there mid-day and the sky is clear blue. As you approach the lake, you’re analyzing the scene before you. Are there wildflowers lining the lake? Is there an interesting rock just off the shore? Maybe the water is so clear you can see rounded cobbles receding into the depths of the lake. Would any of it make an interesting foreground? You study the landscape to determine if the rising or setting sun would best illuminate the mountain peak, and whether or not there’s a ridge or a peak that will block that beautiful light. You walk up and down the lakeshore looking for the most dynamic position from which to photograph the scene. Will you need to use filters to control dynamic range or tame glare on the lake? Maybe the scene would look better in autumn, or summer. Perhaps you’ll have to keep coming back, over and over, to get just the right conditions with dramatic clouds over the peaks as golden light bathes the slopes and the perfectly calm lake catches a crystal clear reflection? These and many more are all considerations flying through our minds as we visualize the art we want to create at this magnificent location.
And that brings me to a conclusion and a question. Is the difference between “taking pictures” and “creating art” the act of visualizing an end result, then using your creativity and skills to make an image that fulfills your vision?
Until next time,
Bret
You can learn more about Bret, view his wonderful images, and read his blog here: Bret Edge Photography
You can find out more about Bret's workshops here: Moab Photo Workshops
Tags: Art, Bret Edge, Creativity Posted in Commentary, Creativity, Landscape, Viewpoint, Vision | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Spring is finally here with all its color, but I thought I would take a look back at the drab winter and give you a few thoughts.
My cure for the photographer’s cabin fever is finding interesting subjects to shoot indoors. It’s not that I’m a wimp and don’t want to brave the cold, its just that what sells the best for me is images with color, and winter takes its toll on any color in nature here in the north.
I can better spend my time marketing during the winter then out shooting images that won’t sell. As much as I like winter, most people that view my images at the art shows tell me they don’t care for winter and they don’t want to look at it all year hanging on their walls. I’m always looking for something interesting to shoot indoors. Probably the most used indoor subject is flowers, and I do my share of flower shots, but I’m always in search of something new to shoot.
I’ve always liked the look of bird feathers, the lines, texture and patterns have always interested me. I have some turkey and sea gull feathers I’ve picked up locally from the parks where I shoot, but I wanted some feathers with a little more design and color. I went online and did a search on feathers. I found sites that were selling a variety of feathers, mainly used for home decor arrangements.
Here are some images of the feathers I received. I had some fun setting them up and shooting!

I arranged these three feathers at slightly different angles as to not have them looking too composed. Shot at my favorite f/stop, f/32, with the Tamron 60mm macro lens.

With this group I used two colorful feathers to flank the center feather which has more earth tones. The resulting contrast allowed the center feather stand out. Also shot with the Tamron 60mm macro at f/32.

These are tiny little feathers that I arranged in this group. I added a 25mm extension tube that would allow me to focus in closer on this small grouping. I wanted a different and more abstract look, so shot this one at f/2.8. The Tamron 60mm set at f/2.8 blurred the edges really well and I placed the point of focus on the center feather.
Even cooped up in winter, you can get your creative juices flowing!
That being said, I'll still take spring.
--Mike
You can visit Mike's blog here: Tiny Landscapes

Tags: Abstract, Art, Close-Up Photography, Macro Composition, Macro Tips, Mike Moats, Tamron Lenses Posted in Articles, Macro, Quick Tip | No Comments »
|
 |
|
The Geek and the Artist
Monday, August 8th, 2011MONARCH BUTTERFLY WING SCALES
One of the things I love about photography is it appeals to both the geek and the artist in all of us. On the geek side you have the technical considerations of making an image; the f-stops, shutter speeds, depth of field, histograms, dynamic range, and that hyperfocal distance stuff that we must all master in order to communicate our vision. Of course we can’t forget about all the ‘geeky’ gear, super telephotos, focusing rails, tele-converters, extension tubes, fill flash, and such. On the artistry side things are a little tougher to define, shape, color, composition, mood, balance, and that fickle mistress light, to mention just a few.
To make a great photograph you have to find the balance between the geek and the artist. If you lean too much toward the geek your pictures, while technically perfect, can lack emotion. They may not reach out and touch the viewer; they can be missing a mood or feeling. Conversely, too much focus on the artistry at the expense of the technical may leave your work riddled with technical flaws distracting the viewer from your message. Most photographers tend to lean in one direction or the other, some are master technicians crossing every t and dotting every i in their images. While others have a flair for the artistic not having the time or desire to bother with all of that technical stuff. A truly great photographer finds a balance and mastery of these two opposing disciplines.
The best photography communicates with the viewer. It reaches out and touches them in some way. Your message does not have to be some deep life changing affirmation. It can be something as simple as, “Wow look how pretty this is!” The most effective way to communicate your message is without technical flaws that distract the viewer from your message. The most powerful way to reach someone is by touching their soul with your artistry.
Browse Steve's wonderful images, read his blog, and learn about his incredible variety of workshops at his site www.stevegettle.com
Tags: Art, technology, viewpoint
Posted in Articles, Commentary, Creativity, Vision | No Comments »