Posts Tagged ‘Commentary’

Top 10 Annoying Things Photographers Say to Each Other

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Paul's post earlier this month–his list of the Top Ten Annoying Things to Say to a Wildlife Photographer was quite popular and it generated a lot of great comments.

With that same sharp wit, Paul has produced another Top Ten list:

This list compiles the top ten things that other photographers have said to him that I’ve found to be annoying. And, the more often I’ve heard something the more annoying it tends to be. That’s just the way I am.

If you’re a photographer who is easily offended or you can’t take a little bit of sarcasm, please don’t read any further. I don’t want your delicate sensibilities to be offended!

With that out of the way, presented in traditional count-down order, here are today’s Top Ten Annoying Things that Photographers Say to Each Other.

 

10. What settings are you shooting at? 

Red-necked Grebe sitting on a nest

Red-necked Grebe sitting on a nest

  • Get a group of photographers together shooting the same subject and invariably one of them will ask one or more of the others this question.  I believe it stems from a sense of insecurity where a less than confident photographer is worried that he’ll miss the shot that everyone else got.  Why not just ask me to send you my shots?
    • In a learning situation this could be a useful question although differences in equipment can make the answer moot.  But, in a group of peers, this question should never be uttered.


9. Did you see my shots in National Geographic? 

  • Is there any photographer who doesn’t want to be published in National Geographic?  Why risk a severe beating by flaunting your awesomeness?

 

8. Dude! Dude! You’re in my shot! 

  • And your feet are nailed to the ground?  Seriously?  Who calls someone “dude” in the first place?  Seriously!

 

7. I’m a Fine Art photographer. 

Fall morning at a beaver pond

Fall morning at a beaver pond

  • If someone can help me understand the difference between a “Fine Art” photographer and a portrait, wedding, landscape, photojournalist, sports or wildlife photographer, I might rescind this item, but the whole term strikes me as a bit pretentious.

 

6. The new K-tel Autocapture 5000 looks good, but I noticed there’s noise in the shadows at ISO 102400. 

  • Maybe the pixel peeping will never quit, but do we have to examine each and every pixel of every new camera to find a flaw only evident at billboard sized prints? Besides photographers more obsessed with pixels than photos, who really cares?

 

5. …in these tough economic times… 

Ruddy Duck displaying on a lake

Ruddy Duck displaying on a lake

  • Okay, this one isn’t specific to photographers, but I’m sick of hearing it.  I propose that the world set up a giant swear jar.  Every time someone utters the phrase ”…in these tough economic times…” they have to put one US dollar into the jar.  Not only will this reduce the use of this annoying phrase but the funds could be used to solve the current economic crisis.

 

4. All of my work is available as limited edition Giclée prints. 

  • So your printer sprays droplets of ink at the paper? Wow!  That’s exactly what my inkjet printer does.
  • Giclée is French don’t ‘cha know.  It’s pronounced “zhee-clay” and it sounds pretentious.  IMHO.

 

3. Oh that?  I can fix that later in Photoshop. 

Black Bear cub trying to get to the bottom of things

Black Bear cub trying to get to the bottom of things

  • Not only is it annoying to hear, it is the calling card of a lazy photographer.

 

2. Oh, you’ve got the K-tel Autocapture 3000?  I just got the K-tel Autocapture 3000 Mark II. 

  • And that makes you a better photographer how?  Oh, that’s right–the Mark II finally introduces the “no sucky photos” setting, whereby the camera will simply not allow the creation of a poor photograph.
  • If so, there are some people I know that would think their K-tel Autocapture 3000 Mark II was broken when it never let them take a picture again!

 

1.  Dude!  Did you get this shot?

Pair of goslings swimming in a pond

Pair of goslings swimming in a pond

  • This is a common question from the serial chimper.  You know, the person you’re out shooting with who is continually chimping their images (looking at the LCD and then pointing and saying ”ooh, ooh, ooh” when they see something they like). They’ll call out when they find a photograph they think is great and you might have missed.  And, don’t call me dude!

 

 

I’m betting that if you’re a photographer who has spent any time photographing around other photographers that you’ve got a few of your own sayings to contribute. Go ahead. It’s very cathartic!

You can find out more about Paul at his website and blog: Paul Burwell Photography

Follow Paul on Twitter here:  link

Check out Paul's Wildlife Photography Academy Workshops here:  link

Top Ten Annoying Things To Say To A Wildlife Photographer

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

The other day I started to think about things people have innocently said to me about my photography that have annoyed me. Now, I know that most of the comments were meant without any malice and were well intentioned.  I get that.  But, that doesn’t stop them from bothering the heck out of me.  I’ve taken the liberty of compiling the top offending comments into a top ten list, presented in the traditional descending order for your reading pleasure.  I also decided to annotate each of the comments with my own thoughts which would not normally remain safely ensconced in my brain.

10. Will you photograph my wedding?

  • Okay, I know that I should take this as a compliment.  But unless the bride and groom are going to wallow through a swamp on all fours, count me out.  Brides and their mothers scare me more than coming face-to-face with a mother bear and her cubs while hiking.
    pfb_20070930_4721-300x200

    Female Black Bear and her cubs walking on a trail

9. Why can’t I get pictures like that with my cell phone?

  • Hmmmmmm.  Tough one.  Could it be that the miniscule image sensor and cheap piece of plastic they call a lens can’t quite compete with quality glass and the resolving power of the sensors in modern digital SLR cameras?
8. Digital is okay I guess, but it’s too bad it doesn’t have the quality of film

  • Hello?  1995 called and they want their camera back.  Seriously, the quality of digital cameras surpassed film several years ago.  Seriously.
    Northern Pintail flying over a golden pond

    Northern Pintail flying over a golden pond

7. That picture would be amazing as a painting.

  • Why in the blue hell is photography held in such poor regard when compared to sketching, painting or sculpting?  I get that these days everybody has a camera of some sort and there are literally millions of images captured each day.  But, I’ll put a great image up against a great painting or sculpture any day in terms of “artistic” merit.
    pfb_20070322_8116_oil-200x300

    Black-capped chickadee perched on the branch of a pine tree – Converted to simulated oil painting to garner some artistic merit

6. That image looks like it could stand a bit more sharpening.

  • Probably the most common bit of “advice” you find on Internet forums when folks post their images.  This age of pixel peeping has lead to an increasing number of people wayyyyyy over sharpening their images.  In my humble opinion.
5. Did you Photoshop® that?

  • Yeah I did.  So what?  Do you realize that folks used to “darkroom” their images, remove flaws, lighten areas, darken areas and even completely alter the image?  Manipulation of photographs goes back to the advent of photography.  A famous example from 1920 is when Stalin had Trotsky removed from an image.
    Stalin and Nikolai Yezhov, before retouching.

    Stalin and Nikolai Yezhov, before retouching.

    Stalin and Nikolai Yezhov, after retouching.

    Stalin and Nikolai Yezhov, after retouching.

4. You were so lucky to be in the right place at the right time.

  • In the same sense that I was lucky to be up an hour before sunrise for a week to arrive at the location in time only to be disappointed 6 out of the 7 days, I guess I was lucky.
    Long tailed weasel looking for baby gophers

    Long tailed weasel looking for baby gophers

3. How many megapixels is your camera?

  • 200 bazillion.  I know that the marketing folks at the various camera manufacturers have worked their butts off to convince folks that megapixels matter.  But, I’m here to tell you that you may be able to get away with bigger crops on a high megapixel camera, my “old” four, six and eight megapixel cameras still make great pictures
2. That’s a really great snapshot.

  • Maybe it’s just me, but I find the term snapshot pejorative in the extreme.  Call it a great picture, image or even capture, but not a snapshot.  Please and thanks.
    Sectored Plate

    Sectored Plate

1. Wow, you must have a really nice camera!

  • Yeah, and that painter must have had a really great easel.  Seriously, a nice camera?  Are you referring to my new K-Tel Autocapture 3000 that not only takes care of all of those confusing exposure calculations, won’t let me make an image that isn’t optimally composed and automatically chooses the perfect instant to make a photograph?  Sure, quality tools will help produce a quality photograph.  But until the Autocapture 3000 actually ships, it is still the photographer who makes decisions on exposure, subject, setting, timing, and composition.
    Yellow-headed Blackbird singing from on top of a bullrush

    Yellow-headed Blackbird singing from on top of a bullrush

If you’ve ever been in a situation where you heard some innocent comment or question about your photography that just bugged the heck out of you, take it in stride.

I hope some of these comments gave you a laugh!

You can find out more about Paul at his website and blog: Paul Burwell Photography

Follow Paul on Twitter here:  link

Check out Paul's Wildlife Photography Academy Workshops here:  link